Showing posts with label think tanks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label think tanks. Show all posts

Friday, February 10, 2017

Global Think Tank Ratings, plus Special Report on Robots at Work


Vol. 3, No. 4 | February 2017 | AAI Foresight


New No. 1 Think Tank


The U.K.’s ChathamHouse has been crowned the 2016 Think Tank of the Year, displacing the Washington, D.C., based BrookingsInstitution as the world’s top-ranked think tank on the Global Go To Think TankIndex. Chatham House also ranked second for the best new idea or paradigm from a think tank, second in foreign policy and international affairs, second in international development, fifth in defense and national security research, eighth in environment policy, eighth in global health policy, ninth in international economics, and 77th in domestic economic policy,

The annual index, produced by University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, has come to be known as an “insider’s guide to the global marketplace of ideas,” says program director James G. McGann, senior lecturer in international studies at the University of Pennsylvania. The index also ranks institutions by region, by subject area, and by type of affiliation, as well as noting special achievements such as most innovative policy proposal and best use of media.

Future-oriented organizations recognized in the 2016 Index include (in alphabetical order):

BrookingsInstitution remains the top-ranked think tank in the United States, as well as first in domestic economic policy, first in foreign policy and international affairs, second in social policy, second in education policy, third for best new idea or paradigm, third in international development, third in international economics, fourth in defense and national security research, fourth in transparency and good governance, fourth in global health policy, fourth in domestic health policy, seventh in environment policy, 18th in energy and resource policy, 44th in science and technology.

InformationTechnology & Innovation Foundation is 58th in the top U.S. think tanks and second in science and technology.

HudsonInstitute is 107th top think tank worldwide and 23rd in the United States, 34th in defense and national security, 35th in foreign policy and international affairs, 58th in international development, and 96th in domestic economic policy.

TheMillennium Project ranks 21st for best new idea or paradigm developed by a think tank.

PewResearch Center is 19th in the top U.S. think tanks, as well as ninth for best use of the Internet, 19th for best use of print or electronic media, and 82nd for best use of social media and networks.

RANDCorporation ranks sixth in the United States and seventh worldwide, second in defense and national security, third in domestic health policy, fourth in education policy, fifth in global health policy, fifth in social policy, sixth in science and technology, seventh in energy and resource, eighth in international economics, 11th in foreign policy and international affairs, 13th in domestic economic policy, 24th in international development, and 30th in environment policy. RAND also took the top spot among think tanks with outstanding policy-oriented research programs and for best quality assurance and integrity policies and procedures.

Resourcesfor the Future is 27th in the United States, 15th in energy and resource policy, 16th in environment policy, and 18th for best new idea or paradigm.

WoodrowWilson International Center for Scholars is eighth worldwide and fifth in the United States, fifth in international development, eighth in foreign policy and international affairs, 30th in defense and national security, 30th in global health policy, 36th for best new idea or paradigm, and 81st in international economics. The Index also named the center No. 3 of think tanks to watch in 2017.

WorldResources Institute ranks 154th worldwide and 16th in the United States, third in environment policy, fourth in energy and resource policy, and 54th for best new idea or paradigm.

WorldwatchInstitute is 40th in the United States and sixth in environment policy.

Comment: Notably for foresight work, three of the 10 think tanks AAI Foresight has tracked over the last three years are the top three on the Index’s list of best transdisciplinary think tanks: Wilson Center, RAND, and Brookings; WRI comes in at number nine. These 10 are by no means the only think tanks doing foresight work, but they are among those we have long applauded for applying futures methodologies in significantly useful ways. –CGW

Source: 2016Global Go To Think Tank Index Report by James G. McGann, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP).


Special Report: The Robots Are Coming—to Make You Creative

By William Halal, Owen Davies, and Hassan Syed

Futurists have been forecasting the emergence and impacts of an artificial intelligence (AI) revolution for many years, so it is satisfying to see that AI is really starting to transform industries, entire economic systems, and society itself.

But there is also a palpable fear of robots coming to take away jobs. Studies conclude that roughly half of present jobs, including professional work, could be lost to automation, possibly leading to mass unemployment and social upheavals.

TechCast recently drew from the collective intelligence of more than 50 experts for a study on AI and work. The study suggests automation is likely to eliminate about 20 percent of routine jobs by 2030, but that the loss is likely to be compensated by about 10 percent of workers gaining a guaranteed minimum income and another 10 percent finding new jobs in creative work. We conclude that a combination of government support and innovative enterprise could absorb this AI threat and turn it into a new domain of creativity and understanding.

Results and Conclusions: Muddling Through

Our survey of experts shows that a majority believe a reasonable path can be found through this difficult transition. We call this the Muddling Through Scenario, a middle scenario in which adaptation to the new technologies occurs organically through a combination of market forces that produce new creative jobs and government support that offers guaranteed benefits. Unemployment is contained at tolerable levels.

Participants in our survey (N=53) anticipate the following changes in the distribution of labor in OECD nations between 2012 and 2030:

- Complex manual labor: down from 19% (2012) to 18% (2030).
- Routine labor: down from 35% to 17%.
- Service and knowledge work: down from 34% to 31%.
- Creative work: up from 4% to 15%.
- Guaranteed minimum income: up from 0% to 8%.
- Unemployment: up from 8% to 11%.

The Possibility of a More Creative Society

This is a modest study, and many complex issues are involved, yet we think this forecast provides useful insights into how the AI issue can be resolved.

TechCast experts collectively judge that humanity will find its way safely through the coming AI/robotics crisis as the world reaches a more fully automated stage of development by about 2030. The adoption of a guaranteed minimum income and the growth of new creative jobs are likely to keep unemployment contained at 10 percent or so, which would be bad but not a major crisis. Furthermore, the widespread use of AI should increase the level of knowledge and intelligence to unprecedented levels, fostering a society of creative change and understanding.

The key is to recognize that AI can automate routine knowledge work, but there exists a huge, unexplored economic domain beyond knowledge: creativity, entrepreneurship, vision, collaboration, diplomacy, marketing, supervision, and other higher-order functions that are uniquely human. Advanced AI may be able to solve tough problems, but it cannot provide vision, purpose, imagination, values, wisdom, and other capabilities that are essential for sound leadership and tough choices.

This study indicates a general belief that intelligent machines and virtual assistants are likely to take over routine service and knowledge tasks. The technology will remain limited, however, and people will always want a real person to provide them human contact and to handle tough issues. Staff is growing rapidly in universities, hospitals, research institutes, and other advanced settings for these reasons. The service and knowledge work sector could grow dramatically, to 50 or 60 percent of the economy by 2030.

In the end, rather than diminishing people, the net effect of AI may be to enhance the value of these higher-order talents that are a unique gift to humanity. This conclusion may seem contrary to many who are convinced a disaster looms ahead. We respectfully suggest that, yes, the robots are coming to take your jobs, but more creative work and better support can also foster a more innovative, prosperous, and thoughtful civilization.

William Halal is professor emeritus at George Washington University and founder of TechCast Global. Reach him at halal@gwu.edu or william.halal@techcastglobal.com. Owen Davies is executive editor of TechCast Global. Hassan Syed is CEO of Bir Ventures and partner in TechCast Global. A longer version of this article will be published by Foresight: The journal of future studies, strategic thinking and policy.

TechCast Global (www.TechCastGlobal.com) forecasts emerging technologies, social trends, and wild cards to cover the entire strategic landscape for planners and decision makers. Its research method uses collective intelligence to pool background data and the knowledge and judgment of 150 experts worldwide. This work is validated for accuracy, showing an average error band of approximately +1/-3 years at 10 years out. For this study, we asked our thought-leader experts to forecast the future distribution of jobs across the occupational spectrum. The survey data can be accessed at TechCast Global, and details of the complete study can be found in our forthcoming article in the journal Foresight.
__________


Send us your signals! News about your work and other tips are welcome, as is feedback on Foresight Signals. Contact Cynthia G. Wagner, consulting editor.

Want more signals from AAI Foresight? Check out the blog! Log in to add comments.
Feel free to share Foresight Signals with your networks and to submit any stories, tips, or “signals” of trends emerging on the horizon that we can share with other stakeholders and the foresight community.

__________

© 2016 AAI Foresight

Foresight Signals is a publication of AAI Foresight
1619 Main Street, #1172
Freeland, WA 98249

Managing Principal: Timothy C. Mack
tcmack333@gmail.com | 202-431-1652

Webmaster and IT Consultant: Tom Warner

Consulting Editor: Cynthia G. Wagner

Designer: Lisa Mathias

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Foresight Signals: Top Think Tanks ... Millennials' View of the Future ... and more


News for the Foresight Community

> Hot Topic: Top Think Tanks
> Findings: How Youth View the Future
> Analysis: Preparing Tomorrow’s Workforce
> Revival: h+ Magazine
> In Memoriam: Richard Spady

Hot Topic: Top Think Tanks


The latest edition of the Global Go To Think Tank Index compiled by James G. McGann, senior lecturer in international studies and director of the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program at the University of Pennsylvania, outlines many of the pressures challenging the leading producers of policy analysis, including growing competition for attention (as well as for funding).

It is no surprise to consumers of such analysis who are already drowning in information overload that fewer long-form reports and white papers are being downloaded, let alone read or acted upon. Research reports in the form of PDF documents are disappearing just as their print counterparts have, McGann says, and even the World Bank confessed recently “that nearly one-third of their PDF reports had never been downloaded.”

Twitter, Instagram, TED talks, and Snapchat might not be the ideal methods to effect change, but social media outlets—today's and those of tomorrow—offer examples of ways to at least break into the news cycle. So McGann's annual index emphasizes innovation among the world's think tanks in areas such as use of the Internet and social media, as well as developing new paradigms for their research work.

One conclusion McGann draws about think tanks' future prospects might qualify as what journalists would call a “buried lead”: death by big data. He writes: “Big data, which involves the collection and analysis of massive amounts of information to pinpoint critical data points and trends, may render think tanks and their staffs superfluous. This new analytic capability enabled by supercomputers, maybe the think tank of the future.”

In Foresight Signals' report on the index last year, we observed the prominence of future-oriented think tanks in several categories, and the latest index similarly acknowledges futurists' work, including:


  •          Brookings Institution retains the title of No. 1 think tank in the world. 
  •          Information Technology & Innovation Foundation is the top U.S. science and technology think tank, second globally to Germany's Max Planck Institute. ITIF was also ranked the 49th top think tank in the United States in 2015, as it was in 2014.
  •          Hudson Institute moves from 31st to 30th top think tank in the United States.
  •        The Millennium Project again places sixth for best new idea or paradigm; it also makes the list (42nd) for best quality assurance and integrity policies and procedures.
  •          Pew Research Center is praised for its innovative Fact Tank program, “written by experts who combine the rigorous research and quality storytelling.”
  •          RAND Corporation drops from seventh to eighth top think tank in the world and from sixth to seventh in the United States. Though RAND fell in most of the categories in which it is listed, it remains a multidisciplinary powerhouse.
  •         Resources for the Future remains the 34th top U.S. think tank and moves up one place, to 17th, for best new idea or paradigm.
  •          Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars surpasses RAND as the top think tank in transdisciplinary research and is listed as one of the “think tanks to watch.” Wilson rises from No. 10 to No. 9 worldwide, retaining the No. 5 spot among U.S. think tanks. 
  •          World Resources Institute retains its position from 2014 as the 15th top U.S. think tank, No. 1 in environmental policy, and No. 9 in transdisciplinary research.
  •          Worldwatch Institute also retains its 2014 positions as No. 35 in the United States and No. 3 in environmental policy.


Source: 2015 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report by James G. McGann. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania. Note: a “Cheat Sheet” listing the top five think tanks in each ranked category is also available.

Signals: institutions, public policy, think tanks


Findings: How Youth View the Future


As each bright new generation of Americans stands poised to change the world, they seem to go through a phase in young adulthood of pessimism about the nation’s future. Now it’s the millennials who report the lowest levels of confidence—as did the Gen Xers and baby boomers in their late teens and early 20s, reports Pew Research Center.

In Pew’s November 2015 survey of Americans’ attitudes toward the government, just 37 percent of millennials said they had “a lot of confidence” in the U.S. future, compared with 45 percent of Gen Xers, 49 percent of boomers, and 56 percent of the silent generation; 20 years ago, Gen Xers were the pessimists, and 40 years ago, the boomers went through this crisis of confidence.

“This finding highlights one of the challenges of generational analysis, namely determining when differences among age cohorts are attributable to life stage rather than to a unique characteristic of a generation,” writes Pew research assistant Samantha Smith.

Reference:  Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government, Pew Research Center, November 15, 2015.

Signals: attitudes, demographics, generations, government, optimism, pessimism


Analysis: Preparing Tomorrow’s Workforce


When is a low unemployment rate bad news? When workers have given up for various reasons, including lacking skills to attain well-paying jobs, says workplace consultant Edward Gordon, principal of Imperial Consulting Corp.

In January, the U.S. unemployment rate was 4.9 percent, but, Gordon writes, “95 million Americans have given up looking for a job. Of these, 45 million are capable of being employed, including 6 million retirees who still want to work. Also there are 20 million people working part-time who are seeking full-time employment.”

As society and the economy have advanced technologically over the last decades, workers have not attained the high skills they need to stay employed satisfactorily, Gordon writes. And this talent gap is costly for employers with vacancies to fill. As Gordon quotes one CEO, “We're spending more money on finding good people than we ever have. What we used to do to find customers, we're now doing to find workers.”

Gordon advocates public-private partnerships that increase investment in local education and training, noting that the need for higher-level skills will only intensify in the future.

Source: “The Undereducated Workforce: Plenty of Jobs—Too Few Workers,” The Gordon Report, February 2016. Download PDF.

Signals: employment, skills, talent, training, workplace


Revival: h+ Magazine’s Future Day


Transhumanists and other fans of h+ (Humanity Plus) Magazine may have wondered at the brief suspension of publication at the end of 2015. The publishers announced on March 1 (Future Day) that h+ is in the process of reinvention as a weekly rather than daily digital journal. “Here in the early 21st century,” writes Peter Rothman, “the idea of what a magazine is or might be is a bit unclear. It seemed therefore to be time to reassess both the form and format of what we were doing and re-envision the future of h+ magazine or whatever it might become.” Details: Future Day 2016: The Return of h+ Magazine,” Humanity+ Media, March 1, 2016.

Speaking of Future Day, a variety of events were held around the world on March 1 to celebrate, discuss, debate, and otherwise think ahead. Details: Future Day Events 2016.




In Memoriam: Richard Spady


Seattle futurist and business man Richard Spady, president of the Forum Foundation and founder of the Stuart C. Dodd Institute for Social Innovation, died January 10 at the age of 92.

Spady was “a social pioneer in civic communications and religious innovation,” said Jay Gary, president of the World Network of Religious Futurists, in which Spady was an active participant. “He will be remembered by his colleagues from WNRF as a committed lay leader of the United Methodist Church, the inventor of the Fast Forum(r) technique for civic education, and the patron of religious futures research undertaken by Dr. Richard Kirby, past chairman of the network.

Spady also was a longtime supporter of the World Future Society and its activities.

“Anyone who came into the orbit of Dick Spady never forgot his enthusiasm for symbolic dialogue and citizen skills,” said Gary. “WNRF is glad his work will continue by his family through the Forum Foundation and National Dialogue Network.”

Read: obituary Seattle Times, January 12, 2016.

__________

Send us your signals! News about your work and other tips are welcome, as is feedback on Foresight Signals. Contact Cynthia G. Wagner, consulting editor. 

Want more signals from AAI Foresight? Check out the blog! Log in to add comments.

Feel free to share Foresight Signals with your networks and to submit any stories, tips, or “signals” of trends emerging on the horizon that we can share with other stakeholders and the foresight community.

__________

© 2016 AAI Foresight

Foresight Signals is a publication of AAI Foresight

1619 Main Street, #1172
Freeland, WA 98249

Managing Principal: Timothy C. Mack
tcmack333@gmail.com | 202-431-1652

Webmaster and IT Consultant: Tom Warner

Consulting Editor: Cynthia G. Wagner

Designer: Lisa Mathias


Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Signals: "Octobot" ... Norway's Warming Fossils... Top Futurist Think Tanks... and more

Vol. 1, No. 8 | February 17, 2015 | AAI Foresight 

Inside Foresight SIGNALS

> Octobot: Octopus-Inspired Robot Could Accelerate Ocean Exploration
> Why Global Warming Has Archaeologists Scrambling
> Growing Pains for Solar Power: Report from Timothy C. Mack
> Futurists and Foresight in the News: Ranking the Think Tanks

Octobot: Octopus-Inspired Robot Could Accelerate Ocean Exploration


Darting through water like a child’s deflating balloon flies through the air, a new octopus-inspired robot promises to accelerate ocean research and development.

Most underwater vehicles are streamlined to reduce drag, but the octobot developed at University of Southampton draws inspiration from cephalopods, which expand their bodies with water that they then quickly expel in order to propel themselves.


Scaling up the size of the prototype robots could enable oceanographers to equip them with instrumentation or other payloads.


Reference: Gabriel Weymouth (University of Southampton), Vignesh Subramaniam (Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology), and Michael Triantafyllou (MIT), “Ultra-fast escape maneuver of an octopus-inspired robot,” Bioinspiration and Biomimetics (Vol. 10, No. 1), published February 2, 2015. doi:10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016016

Signals: biomimicry, engineering, oceanography, robotics

Why Global Warming Has Archaeologists Scrambling


Ancient arrowheads, wooden shafts, and even shoes are starting to turn up in a once-frozen landscape, but archaeologists in Norway are not necessarily rejoicing. As ancient snow patches begin to melt—the ice and snow that protected such artefacts for millennia—there may be little time to sort and preserve these pieces of the past.

Today’s Norway is too hot in the summer and dry in the winter for permanent snow patches and glaciers to form, and those that are there now have survived in small dots tucked away from the sun’s heat and the wind’s power. As the climate changes, however, these small, ancient snow patches are disappearing at an alarming rate, according to scientists at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Geologists are using georadar to measure the thickness of glaciers and snow patches, as well as GPS technologies to track movement (glaciers are moving masses of ice and snow, while the snow patches are stationary).


The researchers have found that some of Norway’s oldest snow patches—5,000 years—are actually glaciers and are now thinning. This makes them more vulnerable to the elements and more likely to disappear, leaving whatever they once protected also exposed and vulnerable.

The loss of the snow patches will also have an effect on wildlife such as reindeer, the scientists warn.


Signals: archaeology, climate change, ecosystems, geology

Growing Pains for Solar Power: Report from Timothy C. Mack


The Kauai Island Utility Cooperative in the Hawaiian Islands would seem to be the poster child for the increasing market penetration of solar power. KIUC has quintupled utility-scale solar capacity over the past year, but the path to the cutting edge has not been an easy one.

As MIT Technology Review contributing editor Peter Fairley recently reported, KIUC’s growth problems are related to power fluctuations and the need for back-up generators powered by diesel or gasoline, as well as to the failure of the utility’s lead-acid battery banks. KIUC is trying again with lithium-ion batteries, which are now rated for four to six times as many cycles and can absorb any excess solar power generation that might occur, Fairley reports.


The lesson here is that foresight tools will always have a useful role in accurate technology assessment and adoption analysis, especially concerning the systemic impacts of new technology applications in new settings and configurations.

Timothy C. Mack is the managing principal of AAI Foresight Inc. This report was adapted from the Foresight SIGNALS Blog. Image: Courtesy of Kauai Island Utility Cooperative.

Futurists and Foresight in the News: Ranking the Think Tanks


Future-oriented think tanks dominated what has become like the Academy Awards for public policy analysis. When the 2014 edition of the Global Go To Think Tank Index Report was released in January by University of Pennsylvania’s Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, U.S.-based Brookings Institution took home the prize as the top think tank in the world, followed by the U.K.’s Chatham House.

Prepared by program director James McGann, the report highlights challenges and trends facing think tanks worldwide, including decreased funding from private and public donors, along with donors’ focus on short-term issues, and growing competition from advocacy groups for the attention of both policy makers and the public.


Though most think tanks have an implicit mission to improve the future, some groups, like the RAND Corporation and The Millennium Project, have been pioneers in developing and applying foresight techniques in their analysis of issues critical to the future. Among the future-oriented think tanks honored in the 2014 report are:

* RAND Corporation: #7 in Top Think Tanks Worldwide and #6 in U.S.; #1 in Best Transdisciplinary Research Program; #2 in Defense and National Security; #2 in Education Policy; #2 in Domestic Health Policy; #3 in Social Policy; #4 in Global Health Policy; #4 in Science and Technology; #5 in Energy and Resource Policy; #6 in International Economic Policy; #6 in Most Significant Impact on Public Policy; #7 in Domestic Economic Policy; #9 in Foreign Policy and International Affairs; #19 in International Development; #30 in Environment

* Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: #10 in Top Think Tanks Worldwide and #5 in the U.S.; #2 in Transdisciplinary Research Program; #4 in International Development; #8 in Foreign Policy and International Affairs; #14 in Most Significant Impact on Public Policy; #27 in Defense and National Security; #5 in Think Tanks to Watch

* Pew Research Center: #7 in Top Think Tanks in the United States, also earning high rankings for use of media (#1), use of the Internet (#3), and advocacy campaign (#7).

* World Resources Institute: #15 in Top Think Tanks in the United States; #1 in Environment; #2 in Energy and Resource Policy; #9 in Transdisciplinary Research Program

* Resources for the Future: #34 in Top Think Tanks in the United States; #9 in Energy and Resource Policy; #11 in Environment; #18 Best New Idea or Paradigm

* Hudson Institute: #31 in Top Think Tanks in the United States; #41 in Foreign Policy and International Affairs; #58 in International Development; #65 in Defense and National Security

* Worldwatch Institute: #35 in Top Think Tanks in the United States; #3 in Environment

* Information Technology & Innovation Foundation: #49 in Top Think Tanks in the United States; #2 in Science and Technology

* Canada 2020: #30 in Top Think Tanks in Canada and Mexico and #59 in Think Tanks to Watch

* Institucion Futuro (Spain): #137 in Top Think Tanks Worldwide and #72 in Western Europe

* The Millennium Project: #6 in Best New Idea or Paradigm. The report did not specify a particular new idea or paradigm, but The Millennium Project has recently developed the Global Futures Intelligence System (GFIS), which certainly merits note.

The Best New Idea or Paradigm by a Think Tank was one of several special achievement categories added in 2013 (along with best conference, best collaboration, best use of social networks, and others), giving the peer nominators and reviewers more opportunities to highlight outstanding work by the world’s cadre of professional thinkers.


Signals: institutions, public policy, think tanks



Send us your signals! News about your work and other tips are welcome. Contact Cynthia G. Wagner, consulting editor.  

Want more signals from AAI Foresight? Check out the blog! Log in to add comments.

Feel free to share Foresight SIGNALS with your networks and to submit any stories, tips, or “signals” of trends emerging on the horizon that we can share with other stakeholders and the foresight community. And if you’re interested in becoming a blogger for FS, please contact Cindy Wagner, our consulting editor, at CynthiaGWagner@gmail.com



Foresight SIGNALS is a publication of AAI Foresight

1619 Main Street #1172
Freeland, WA 98249

Managing Principal: Timothy C. Mack
tcmack333@gmail.com | 202-431-1652

Webmaster and IT Consultant: Tom Warner

Consulting Editor: Cynthia G. Wagner